econarchy

11. February 2009

Murder!

Filed under: corruption — Me @ 15:42

The owner of the peanut company responsible for the Salmonella outbreak disclosed in internal emails that he knew peanuts were tainted with Salmonella, but ordered them to be shipped anyway. If this is true, he has the blood of the 9 (so far) who have died on his hands. Such intentional and gross negligence deserves nothing less than substantial prison time.

The owner of a peanut company blamed for a salmonella outbreak has appeared before a House subcommittee, but is refusing to testify.

Lawmakers ordered Peanut Corporation of America owner Stewart Parnell to appear at the hearing Wednesday. He showed up, but refused to answer questions, invoking his constitutional right not to incriminate himself.

Earlier, the House Energy and Commerce Committee released the company’s internal correspondence showing that Parnell was ordering tainted products to be sold even after confirmation of salmonella. Parnell complains in e-mails about losing money and says he’s frustrated by the delay in shipping products.

Parnell was ordered by subpoena to appear before Congress on Wednesday to discuss the outbreak that has led to 600 illnesses, eight deaths and one of the largest recalls in history, more than 1,800 products pulled. His Georgia plant is blamed for the outbreak.

Read More

Octuplets’ mom on welfare, receives food stamps, Medicaid

Filed under: parasites, welfare, society — Me @ 02:39

No surprises here. The “octuplets mom” from California that has been plastered all over the news lately is a government dependent. She didn’t pay for her child births (the taxpayers of California get that priveledge) and she doesn’t think that the Food Stamps she receives are welfare. Oh, she also doesn’t have a job and has over $50k in student loans.

I am going out on a limb here and guess she voted for Obama. Oh, and based on the picture below, it seems as though she can afford plastic surgery and lip injections. Gross.

octomom

 Nadya Suleman has 14 children, including newborn octuplets. She has no job, no income and owes $50,000 in student loans.

But Suleman faces what are likely to be millions of dollars in medical bills alone, and it’s increasingly likely that taxpayers will foot many of those bills.

Her family is eligible for large sums of public assistance money. Even before she gave birth to the octuplets Jan. 26, Suleman was receiving $490 in monthly food stamps, and three of her children were receiving federal supplemental security income because they are disabled.

 Read More

Shock of shocks! New study shows fat women more likely to have children with birth defects

Filed under: society — Me @ 02:32

If there is anyone out there not 100% convinced that obesity is the most preventable dangerous health condition, well, my guess is you are probably fat. Here is another study from the “no duh” file:

fatso

Researchers at Newcastle University found that babies born to obese mothers were more likely to suffer from a range of abnormalities.

They were more than twice as likely to be born with spina bifida, in which the spinal cord is incomplete, causing disability,

They were also 30 per cent more likely to have heart defects and 20 per cent more likely to be born with a cleft palate, the review of 39 separate scientific studies, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, shows.

Read More…

Geithner is a joke, Obama is a Marxist, and Liberals are Thieves.

Filed under: taxes, liberals, economic stimulus, obama — Me @ 01:11

I don’t know where Obama found his Cabinet members (besides the “Golden Parachute” club on Wall Street). One thing is for sure, we now know why Liberals don’t mind raising taxes - because they don’t pay them! Daschle, Geithner, and the rest are tax dodging cheats. Don’t be fooled; they get away with stuff that you and I would pay dearly for.

This guy Geithner is a fraud and a joke. He has zero credibility and, like his boss, has no qualifications for his job. That was proven today when he layed out his THREE TRILLION DOLLAR plan for the Fed to rescue banks.  The market responded appropriately - by dropping almost 400 points. You see, our stock market is a function of Free Market Capitalism, and Obama’s entire administration are the trojan horse of full-blown Marxism.

virginYou can call it “hope”, you can call it “being responsible”, you can call it “helping those in need”, but the simple fact is that this Liberal administration is ushering in an era of Marxism the likes of which we have never seen. They desire to turn the US into France, Germany, or worse (if such a thing is possible). In the late 90’s under Newt, Conservatives helped lower the government spending to just over 18% of GDP. If Obama and Pelosi and the rest of the Liberals have their way, government spending will represent 40% of GDP. That puts us right in line with the most Socialistic and Marxist nations on earth. And that is what Liberals want.

When you hear about all of this, an intelligent and logical thinker can only come to one conclusion - Liberals benefit from a bad economy. Does that scare you? It should. Talk about a conflict of interest…. It is very true. Liberals want big government, and we are seeing now that nothing stimulates government expansion like a bad economy. The worse the economy, the more government expansion. Liberals have always held the belief that more government is the solution to any economic problem, and they are really putting that into practice now.

“Economic Stimulus”? Please. This is pure, unadulturated government spending. It is pork. It is earmarks.  It is classic, old-school Washington at work. Is this the “change” we were promised? Hardly. Obama keeps claiming, repeatedly, that this “Economic Stimulus” bill has no pork and no earmarks? Really? Well then what about all of the pork and earmarks? Even the AP is calling Obama out on his lies. Obama, in addition to all of his other fatal flaws, is also a pathological liar. He thinks his constituents are dumb, and lucky for him, a lot of them are. Really, really dumb.

Growing up, I was taught that taking money from someone else to keep for yourself or give to someone else was STEALING. When you create a narrowly-defined group that represents only a small percentage of the population (i.e. a “minority group”) and force that group to pay for every fleeting desire of the majority of the population, that is theft. Pure and simple. That isn’t “patriotism”. Even calling it Socialism is being nice. It is STEALING. Period. And it is unfair, unjust, and un-Constitutional to make a few people pay for the needs of the many. For shame on the liberals and the greedy, selfish and ignorant sheep that voted them into power.

Intro to econarchy

Filed under: Uncategorized — Me @ 00:49

Welcome. Thoughts posted here will range from quick, “twitter-esque” messages to full blown essays and analysis. All will be very opinionated, some may be controversial. Comments are welcome.

Powered by WordPress